WorkWeek Radio/Media

4 days ago

Palace Coup at Pacifica
pacificafightback.org/palace-coup-at-pacifica/
April 8, 2025

We listener and staff members of Pacifica, including members of the Pacifica National Board and the several Local Station Boards, were summarily presented with a so-called “settlement agreement” between New Day Pacifica and some designated members of the Pacifica National Board acting on behalf of the Pacifica Foundation, Inc. that imposes new Bylaws on the Foundation. This reverses the results of the membership vote that rejected essentially the same package of Bylaws changes. DON’T OUR VOTES MATTER?

These new Bylaws affect our voting rights, and that violates our existing Bylaws requirement that the national board and local station boards vote on Bylaws changes, and that membership votes are required on Bylaw changes when our voting rights are taken away or other material changes are made in our representation.

The settlement was presented to us on Thursday, April 3rd without any notice, as a fait accompli, and especially without even proposing, let alone carrying out, a vote of the two existing classes of membership—even though the “settlement” additionally and essentially divides our staff into a paid class and a separate third unpaid class, especially disenfranchising the unpaid staff who are a large majority of the total staff and do the vast majority of the programming work.

DIVIDING THE STAFF IN TWO

Placing paid and unpaid staff in two separate and unequal constituencies, and reducing their overall representation in governance, as well as preventing them from being elected as officers, are clear material changes and effectively create a new, third class of membership, in blatant contradiction of the founding documents which specify two classes — listener members, and staff members whether paid or unpaid. Calling this a “settlement” unintentionally exposes its illegality, like the Israeli “settlements” on occupied Palestinian territory.

We members — even Board members — were not properly informed or involved in the process of reaching a settlement, nor represented appropriately, either through the PNB’s participation in the process or by what should be a required new membership referendum on these substantially different Bylaws revisions. Instead, we were kept in the dark until the New Day faction in control of the PNB reached an agreement essentially with itself, wearing the hat of litigants for New Day AGAINST Pacifica.

This “settlement” abrogates the democratic will of our members, who already rejected the proposed Bylaws in a vote, as the court ruled in a summary judgment on the underlying case, in direct contrast to the goals of our Bylaws which are to enhance member participation.

In addition to violating our own Bylaws, we believe that this also violates California’s administrative procedural laws, especially as any discussion and votes on this were held in executive session, so that they are not on record, and members have no way of knowing how their station’s representatives voted. What’s more, one of the participants in orchestrating this “settlement” from the Foundation’s side was actually a litigant for the other side and the named member of the opposing side in the proposed ‘New Day Pacifica’ Bylaws revision.

The case on which this mediation was based had been decided in court, with the previous judge saying that the election results defeating the proposed changes were valid, as the necessary majorities of both classes of membership — the listener sponsors and the (paid and unpaid) staff — were not achieved.

We members relied on that finding, and were not expecting a mediation that in effect would reverse our 2021 election and referendum results. But the same party to the litigation mentioned above belatedly introduced new issues, threatening further and different costly litigation, leading to the mediation. The mediation overturns the previous ruling and the election results, and imposes a new version of the Bylaws similar in key respects to the ones that were defeated by the members and whose rejection by the membership was upheld by the court.

In particular, the mediation results, which were not presented to the full board before being signed, overturn and diminish the voting rights of the unpaid staff members within the Foundation governance, change the terms of the directors and officers of the Foundation and eliminate many of the duties, powers and voting rights of the Local Station Boards and their members.

BAIT AND SWITCH

Another example of the mendacious and deceptive nature of these new Bylaws and the process by they are attempting to impose them, is that the new Bylaws claim to continue the “single transferable vote” choice voting system that guaranteed a kind of proportional representation and minority voices in governance. However, they have converted every seat on the new National Board that members get a chance to vote on into a single office-holder position, so that the same simple majority can name every single seat. Even where there are multiple seats to be voted on by the Board members to elect additional members, each voter has as many votes as there are seats, so that again, the same simple majority can name all the winners.

Also as mentioned above, while the new Bylaws claim there are two classes of members, listeners and staff, this is immediately followed not by two definitions, but by THREE – a) listener members; b) paid staff members; and c) volunteer staff members. This change is disguised or hidden in the revised table of contents to the Bylaws, WHICH DOES NOT LIST THE TWO SEPARATE CATEGORIES OF STAFF MEMBERS, BUT ONLY LISTS A) LISTENER MEMBERS AND B) STAFF MEMBERS — that is, the “table of contents” does not describe the actual contents of the document it introduces. It shows a different title for B, and does not list C — the “volunteer staff members” — at all. This is not just sloppy editing — it is intentional deception, to hide the reality that the far larger UNPAID staff, who have always been the lifeblood of a non-profit non-commercial operation, and who produce and provide the overwhelming majority of the content Pacifica broadcasts, are being intentionally short-changed in these new Bylaws.

All of those Bylaw features that are now being changed in the proposed settlement were part of a set of Bylaws carefully designed to create and protect a democratically-governed membership organization, that recognized the equality and importance of all the volunteers who sustain it. Those Bylaws were not overturned before the settlement, so they should be followed, and as such membership approval is required before any such changes can be made, but New Day and their PNB members are trying to make an end run around this by claiming it is a settlement of litigation over the prior vote and that no further vote is needed.

You can find the existing Bylaws (which have ALREADY BEEN REMOVED from Pacifica.org) and a line by line comparison of the changes here on our website: pacificafightback.org/pacificas-bylaws-changed-your-vote-discarded/ — scroll down below the text of this same analysis, which is repeated on that page. … See MoreSee Less

Palace Coup at Pacifica

pacificafightback.org

Palace Coup at Pacifica April 8, 2025April 8, 2025 admin We listener and staff members of Pacifica, including members of the Pacifica National Board and the several Local Station Boards, were summaril…

WorkWeek Radio/Media

4 months ago

UnitedHealthcare & Union Bureaucrats Promote Medicare Privatization; Coalition to Defend African Stream Stands Up Against Censorship; Remembering Gary Webb and His Explosive Revelations About the U.S. Government’s Role in the Crack Epidemic
capitalismraceanddemocracy.org/2024/12/15/unitedhealthcare-coalition-to-defend-african-stream-sta…

The murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City on December 4 has led to a massive outpouring of anger against the insurance industry for its common practice of denials and delays of healthcare claims. A TikTok content creator and self-described insurance worker talked about how the insurance industry has been behind the efforts to privatize Medicare.

Labor journalist Joe Masicalo of Work-Bites spoke to Pacifica’s Steve Zeltzer about top union leaders who have secretly conspired to push the privatization of Medicare by pushing workers and retirees into Medicare Advantage.

***

On September 13, Secretary of State Antony Blinken held a press conference accusing the Russian media outlet RT of covertly spreading Kremlin propaganda, targeting audiences not only in the United States but also in Africa and beyond. Blinken specifically called out African Stream, a Pan-African media platform distributed through its website, AfricanStream.media, and various social media channels. Shortly after Blinken’s remarks, African Stream was banned on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok—likely under pressure from the State Department.

Block Report’s JR Valrey spoke to Julie Varughese, the output editor for African Stream. Varughese and others are organizing a petition to address the McCarthy-like attack on African Stream.

***

December 10th marked the 20th anniversary of the death of investigative journalist Gary Webb. Many believe that Webb was murdered because of his groundbreaking exposé, The Dark Alliance, which was published in the San Jose Mercury News in 1997.

Webb’s report uncovered and extensively documented the U.S. government’s role in fueling the crack cocaine epidemic of the 1980s and 1990s. According to Webb, the CIA created the epidemic in Black neighborhoods in the Bay Area and Los Angeles to covertly fundraise to support the Nicaraguan Contras in their fight against the revolutionary Sandinistas in Nicaragua. The ensuing violence and devastation from the crack epidemic were later used to justify the mass incarceration of Black and Brown communities, feeding the U.S. prison system.

Next, we share excerpts from Donald Lacy’s 2004 interview with Webb. It was recorded at downtown Oakland’s Jahva House months before Webb’s death for San Francisco’s Radio 89.5 KPOO.

***

Today’s program was produced by the Capitalism, Race & Democracy collective, with contributions from Steve Zeltzer and JR Valrey, and hosted by Polina Vasiliev.

You can find this and all previous episodes at our website “capitalism race and democracy dot ORG”. Make sure you click the subscribe button. Follow us on X, formerly Twitter, @PacificaCRD.

Thanks for listening!

Music:

Seun Kuti, “Black Times”

Def Poetry – Amir Sulaiman – Danger … See MoreSee Less

UnitedHealthcare & Union Bureaucrats Promote Medicare Privatization; Coalition to Defend African Stream Stands Up Against Censorship; Remembering Gary Webb and His Explosive Revelations About the U.S. Government's Role in the Crack Epidemic -…

capitalismraceanddemocracy.org

  The murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City on December 4 has led to a massive outpouring of anger against the insurance industry for its common practice of denials and delay…

WorkWeek Radio/Media

4 months ago

The Smithsonian Looks at How the Slave Trade Shaped the World
“In Slavery’s Wake,” at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, looks beyond the United States to tell a global story.
www.nytimes.com/2024/12/13/arts/slavery-smithsonian-african-american.html

This immersive installation includes a sense of transportation to an underwater world, with animations projected onto the walls.
Part of an installation by Daniel Minter included in “In Slavery’s Wake,” an exhibition at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture in WashingtonCredit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
Jennifer Schuessler.png
By Jennifer Schuessler
Dec. 13, 2024
“In Slavery’s Wake,” a new exhibition at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, deals in huge themes and vast numbers. Over four centuries, an estimated 12 million Africans were transported across the ocean on more than 36,000 voyages, an epochal forced migration that reshaped societies on both sides of the Atlantic.

But of the artifacts on view in the show, it’s sometimes the smallest that speak most powerfully.

A panel in the exhibition that reads “Navigating the Wake,” beside a portrait of a Bahian woman, wearing an elaborate charm bracelet. An actual bracelet is displayed below it.
The exhibition, organized by an international group of curators, puts names and faces to the trans-Atlantic slave trade, telling stories that complicate the standard timelines and geographies of slavery and abolition.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
In a case in one corner, there’s a scattering of cowrie shells excavated at Valongo Wharf in Rio de Janeiro, the point of entry for nearly 900,000 enslaved people, which was lost to history until a construction crew stumbled on the ruins a decade ago.

The shells, which may have been carried by people who endured the Middle Passage, are a rare and remarkable survival. But they are also a metaphor for the difficulties of truly grasping the subject of slavery, Johanna Obenda, one of the show’s curators, explained recently during a tour of the exhibition.

“With this history, oftentimes we get lost in the enormity,” she said. “It’s challenging to even process. But when you see artifacts like this, you start to see faces, people.”
Image
Small cowrie shells are arranged in a circle surrounding a larger one in a display.
Cowrie shells excavated at Valongo Wharf in Rio de Janeiro, the point of arrival for an estimated 900,000 enslaved Africans. They may have been carried by survivors of the Middle Passage.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
“In Slavery’s Wake: Making Black Freedom in the World,” which opens on Friday, is one of the most ambitious shows the museum has presented since it opened on the National Mall eight years ago. The product of a 10-year collaboration among nearly two dozen curators at 10 institutions on four continents, it goes beyond the Smithsonian’s traditional American focus to tell a global story of the ways that slavery shaped the modern world.

It’s a story of trade, capitalism, exploitation and violence, but also of the ways that the enslaved and their descendants constantly pushed back, creating their own freedom in ways big and small.

“If we’re talking about violence and attempted dehumanization, we’re also talking about the way people resisted and held on to their humanity,” Paul Gardullo, the museum’s assistant director of history and one of the exhibition’s directors, said.

After closing in Washington next June, the show will travel to partner museums in Brazil, South Africa, Senegal, Belgium and Britain, switching languages — and swapping out some objects — along the way.
Image
Among the items in a display case are a posters reading “Organise Without Fear: Join the Union!!” and “Black Lives Matter.”
A display including signs from Black Lives Matter protests around the world. The show connects the history of resistance to slavery to the unfinished work of Black “freedom-making” today.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
At the Smithsonian, it complements the story in the museum’s permanent history galleries, which chronicle how African Americans not only claimed their own freedom, but also shaped American ideas of liberty, justice and democracy.

“The African American experience is deeply, deeply important for world history,” Gardullo said “But it’s not all there is.”

Today, in the United States, slavery may be a more politically contentious subject than it was when the museum opened to broad acclaim in 2016. As Lonnie G. Bunch III, the Smithsonian’s secretary, puts it in an introduction to the show’s companion book, “A strong current of political leaders wants to prevent the public from engaging with Black history, which they deem ‘too divisive,’ and create a culture of silence.”
Image
In a display case are ankle shackles and handcuffs, with drawings of how they can be used.
One case juxtaposes shackles used on enslaved people, produced by the British company Hiatt & Co, with modern handcuffs produced by Hiatt today.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
Anthony Bogues, a professor of Africana studies at Brown University and another project director, said in a telephone interview that the group had thought hard about how to draw connections between history and the present without sparking defensiveness.

“We are careful about making sure we are not banging people on the head, but telling stories in a certain kind of sophisticated but simple way so they say, ‘Oh, I see,’” Bogues said.

Wrestling unflinchingly with slavery and its legacy, Gardullo said, is the museum’s core mission. Done well, he said, “it’s about Black love and Black freedom, not about white guilt.”

The seeds of the exhibition were planted in 2014, when a group of international curators met at Brown’s Ruth J. Simmons Center for the Study of Race and Justice, which Bogues leads. The center had done a study of about 90 exhibitions about slavery presented around the world over the previous decade. Most, it found, told a national or regional story, which neglected one of the central realities that scholars increasingly emphasize: its transnational nature.

Over the following years, the group brainstormed ways to create an exhibit that wouldn’t just tell a global story, but do it through a genuine global partnership.

As the meetings moved to Amsterdam, Cape Town, Rio de Janeiro and other cities, the curators settled on several basic principles. The exhibition couldn’t just tell a linear story that ended neatly with emancipation. African partners in particular (the show will also travel to the Iziko Museums of South Africa in Cape Town and the Museum of Black Civilizations in Dakar) emphasized the need to connect the slave trade with European colonial domination of Africa, which intensified after slavery was fully abolished in the Americas in the late 19th century.

A panel reading “In Slavery’s Wake: Making Black Freedom in the World” sits next to a video wall showing water imagery.
The entry to “In Slavery’s Wake,” with a video by Tiffany McNeil. “Rather than starting from a historical launching point, we wanted to meet people where they are and create a mood,” Johanna Obenda, one of the curators, said.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
The exhibition also needed to foreground the voices of the enslaved and colonized and their descendants. To that end, the curators started an oral history project, Unfinished Conversations, which has so far gathered more than 150 interviews around the world, some of which are woven into the exhibit.

Still, when it came to creating an actual exhibition, the curators faced some basic questions: What to call it? And where to begin?

The title draws on the scholar Christina Sharpe’s metaphor of “the wake”: a reference to the wake behind a ship, the still-churning waters of history, the watching over of the dead, and the coming to consciousness. An opening video installation, by the filmmaker Tiffany McNeil, introduces the idea with a collage of contemporary scenes, archival footage and watery imagery.
Image
A wall of cutouts contains instruments and images of people playing instruments.
A peek-through wall in the installation by Daniel Minter incorporates musical instruments and other artifacts enslaved people used as “tools of freedom.”Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
“Rather than starting from a historical launching point, we wanted to meet people where they are and create a mood,” Obenda said.

A historical section presents plenty of cold, hard facts, starting with a wall map showing the flow of the roughly 12 million Africans carried away into chattel slavery (which was distinct from the forms of bondage that had long existed in many societies, including in Africa). Of those people, about 500,000 came to what is now the United States — a figure dwarfed by the estimated five million who landed in Brazil.

Another graphic illustrates the web of institutions — banks, insurance companies, universities — that benefited from slavery, and the ways that law, religion and science were used to create and enforce the idea of Black inferiority.

Nearby is a hulking 19th-century commodity scale from Bahia, Brazil, that was used to weigh crops grown by enslaved people (and possibly, a label suggests, the enslaved themselves).

It feels eerie, even threatening. But near the top, Obenda pointed out the elaborate decorative ironwork across the balance.

“There were so many skilled African artisans and ironworkers in Brazil,” she said. “It makes me wonder, ‘Who made this? Whose hands touched it?’”
Image
A portrait of a woman wearing a headdress, one hand draped over the other.
A portrait of Marème Diarra, an enslaved woman who in the 1890s walked hundreds of miles from Mali to a “freedom village” in Senegal, where slavery had been abolished. At bottom, artifacts excavated near her home.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times

The show puts names and faces to such questions, with installations dedicated to nine individuals from around the world. Together, they complicate traditional geographies and timelines of slavery and abolition.

Marème Diarra was a woman from Mali enslaved in Mauritania, who in the 1890s walked hundreds of miles with her children to the settlement of St. Louis, Senegal, one of many so-called freedom villages in that French colony, where slavery was abolished in 1848.

But those freedom villages effectively became work camps, with laborers trapped in a new kind of unfreedom. Through oral history interviews in Senegal, exhibition researchers learned that Diarra had left the town and settled in a smaller village nearby, where a team excavating her homesite found buttons and other objects.
Image
Three sculptures are shown in a case, one a vessel with a face on it, another a figure standing upright and a third sitting cross-legged.
A “face vessel” (upper left) possibly made by Tahro, a man from the Kongo kingdom who arrived in the United States in 1858 on an illegal slave ship, is displayed with traditional Kongo figures known as minkisi.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
Tahro was an enslaved man taken from the Kongo kingdom at 27, and brought to the U.S. in 1858 on an illegal slave ship, one of many that continued to arrive for decades after Congress banned the international slave trade in 1808. He settled in Edgefield, S.C., and worked in a commercial pottery, where enslaved artisans sometimes made “face vessels” that echo traditional Kongo figures.

“This was a lived history for millions of people, but with most of them, their names are lost to history,” Obenda said. “We were really deliberate in looking for people we could name, who could stand in for others.”

The exhibition includes virtually no names or images of enslavers, and only a handful of objects used to torture or subjugate. Instead, the emphasis is on survival and resistance.
Image
A flag where the top half is blue and the bottom red, with an inset depicting a trophy of weapons atop a green hill and a royal palm symbolizing independence.
A rare early flag from the Haitian Republic, the first free Black republic in the Western Hemisphere, which was established in 1804 after enslaved people overthrew French rule.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
There’s a rare early flag for the Haitian Republic, founded in 1804 after enslaved people overthrew French rule. Alongside it are banners representing some of the hundreds of known slave rebellions across the Atlantic world, created by the artist Nuygen E. Smith.

The show’s final section, dedicated to contemporary art, culture, music and protest, emphasizes that Black freedom-making is a continuing, unfinished process. After this section’s explosion of color and sound, it might be easy to miss a piece of bent, rusted metal in a case near the exit.
Image
A banner reads Death or Liberty, all in capital letters.
Curators commissioned the artist Nuygen E. Smith to create flags for some of the hundreds of recorded slave rebellions. Here, a banner for Prosser’s Rebellion, a planned rebellion in Virginia in 1800, which drew on the ideals of the American Revolution.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times
It’s a keel bolt from the São José, a slave ship that sank off the Cape of Good Hope in 1794, whose wreck was discovered in 2015. But it’s also another metaphor — for the hard work of recovering the vast and still largely submerged global history of slavery.

“The exhibition is an opening, a catalyst,” Gardullo said. “It’s not the end of the story.” … See MoreSee Less

The Smithsonian Looks at How the Slave Trade Shaped the World

www.nytimes.com

“In Slavery’s Wake,” at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, looks beyond the United States to tell a global story.